ASHOK KUMAR Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) C R M-4266 of 2016 Allowed as prayed for. This application is for placing on record Annexures R-1 to R-6.

(2.) Learned counsel for the complainant opposes grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners on the ground that the factum of earlier marriage with Preeti Sharma was not disclosed to the complainant whereas the petitioners were aware about the said marriage being in close relation of the petitioners'. The offence was committed by main accused in connivance with the petitioners.

(3.) Learned State counsel also opposes grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners as they were directly involved in the case and specific allegations are levelled against them. They were aware about the earlier marriage but still it was not informed to the complainant. Heard arguments of learned counsel for the parties and have also perused the allegations levelled in the FIR and other documents available on the file.