LAWS(P&H)-2016-11-77

VINOD KUMAR Vs. ARUNA JAIN AND ANOTHER

Decided On November 07, 2016
VINOD KUMAR Appellant
V/S
Aruna Jain And Another Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This is revision against the concurrent orders/judgments by learned Rent Controller, Hansi and learned Appellate Authority, Hisar allowing the petition filed by respondent No.1-landlord under Sec. 13 of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973 (later referred to as the 'Haryana Rent Act') seeking eviction of the revision petitioner from the demised shop bearing No.19-D/11 situated in Gali Naion Wali, Hansi District Hisar.

(2.) Respondent No.1-landlord sought the ejectment of petitioner from the demised shop on the ground of personal bona fide necessity which was described in para 2 (A) as follows:-

(3.) Respondent No.1-landlord has also averred in the ejectment petition that revision petitioner had parted with exclusive possession of the demised shop and sublet the same to respondent No.2, who is in exclusive possession of this shop. It was also pleaded that revision petitioner-tenant is in arrears of rent since 01.01.2008.