(1.) Dispute between the parties is with regard to a small piece of land which the petitioner says is a part of plot No 199/24,whereas the respondents contend contrary to it. On second remand by Director Consolidation of Holdings, Haryana, matter was taken up by Assistant Director, Consolidation of Holdings. He got the demarcation done, at the spot, of khasra Nos. 199/24 and also adjoining plots bearing Nos. 199/30/1, 30/2, 30/3. After effecting measurement and hearing the parties, the officer observed thus:
(2.) Against the order dated January 03,2005, referred to above, petitioners filed a revision petition under Section 42 of the East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fregmentation) Act, 1948, which was dismissed, vide order dated June 30,2006. This Court feels that the orders passed by the authorities are perfectly justified. Findings referred to above, have been giving after getting demarcation done at the spot . Order passed by Assistant Director of Consolidation (Annexure P-4) is a speaking one. No case for interference is made out by this Court.
(3.) Writ petition stands dismissed.