MAHENDER YADAV Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB

JUDGEMENT

(1.) COUNSEL for the petitioner contends that the FIR discloses a robbery in the complainant's house at about 1/1.30 am, by four unknown persons. In the supplementary statement, the complainant named the petitioner and the other co-accused. It is further contended that the petitioner is a cousin brother of the complainant's father-in-law. The petitioner is a permanent resident of UP and the present FIR has been lodged on account of a matrimonial dispute between the petitioner's cousin brother's son and the complainant. The complainant was summoned by the Ilaqa Magistrate, Jaunpur (UP). A compromise was subsequently effected but thereafter in order to wreak vengeance, the complainant lodged the present FIR. Notice of motion to A.G.Punjab for 20.7.2006. To be heard alongwith Crl.Misc.No.26727.M of 2006.

(2.) MEANWHILE, in the event of his arrest, the petitioner shall be released on interim anticipatory bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to the following conditions :-