(1.) (Oral)
(2.) THE petitioner filed CWP No.1362 of 2005, in which, vide an interim order dated 28.2.2005 passed by this court, recovery against her were stayed. It is averred that despite communication of this order, the respondent effected recovery of Rs.6,000/- from the monthly salary of the petitioner, as is evident from the receipt dated 31.3.2005 (Annexure P-2). Learned Counsel for the petitioner, however, fairly states that no recovery has been effected by the respondent from the petitioner's salary thereafter.