TARSEM DEVI Vs. NARESH KUMAR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE plaintiff is in revision petition against the order passed by the learned trial Court on 21.11.2003, whereby Vaibhav Gandotra was ordered to be impleaded as a defendant.

(2.) THE plaintiff has filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement dated 28.8.2000 allegedly executed by defendant No. 1 Naresh Kumar. In the said suit, an application was filed alleging therein by Vaibhav Gandotra that he is a co-parcener with Naresh Kumar defendant No. 1 and, therefore, his father has no right to enter into an agreement of sale in favour of the plaintiff. Thus, it is alleged that he is a necessary party in the present suit. The said application was allowed by the learned trial Court.