LAWS(P&H)-2006-4-274

RAMESH Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

Decided On April 05, 2006
RAMESH Appellant
V/S
STATE OF HARYANA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) APPELLANT -Ramesh is in appeal against the order of his conviction recorded under Section 376 read with Section 511 of Indian Penal Code with the allegation that he had attempted to commit offence of rape of Smt. Santosh wife of Shri Krishan.

(2.) THE prosecution story, in brief, as is revealed from the statement of prosecutrix-Santosh wife of Shri Krishan (PW-7) is that on 27.7.1992, she was alone present in her house when the accused Ramesh came to the house and tried to molest her. PW-7 states that she raised noise and called her brother-in- law (Jeth). Hearing this, accused Ramesh went away leaving the spot. PW-7 has further stated that after some time, she went to the well to fetch water where accused Ramesh again came to her from Peepal side. As per PW-7, there the accused grappled with her, threw her on the ground and laid on her. She has also mentioned that the accused broke open the string of her Salvar, removed his Dhoti and kept the same on his shoulder and made an attempt to commit the offence of rape on her. She has claimed that in order to save her honour, she kicked the accused with her legs and did not allow penetration. Her version then reveals that Kamla and Ram Pyari had reached the spot and seeing these two ladies, the accused fled away from the spot. PW-7 states that she felt so insulted that after coming to her house, she poured kerosene oil on her person and set herself on fire. She, however, was saved by one Kartar (not examined) and others, who were neighbourers of PW-7. He also took her to Civil Hospital, Rohtak. There she had narrated the facts to the Doctor attending on her, who recorded her statement and obtained her thumb impression thereon. On the basis of a Ruqa sent by the Doctor, Police had reached the hospital and recorded FIR. Investigation followed leading to the charge being preferred against the accused under Section 376 read with Section 511, IPC.

(3.) IN support of his stand, the accused had examined one witness, namely, Ram Kumar, and rested his case at that.