SUKH RAM Vs. JEETO DEVI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) (Oral)

(2.) THIS revision petition is directed against an order dated 8.3.2006 passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Panchkula whereby the petitioner-defendant's evidence has been closed by order. Since the order which I propose to pass is not likely to cause any prejudice to the respondent, no notice of motion is being issued. From the perusal of the impugned order, it is apparent that several opportunities have already been granted to the petitioner, including the last opportunity subject to payment of costs. The petitioner, however, failed to avail those opportunities and did not lead the entire evidence. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that only one opportunity may be given to the petitioner to conclude his evidence. It is pointed out that the suit is now fixed on 5.6.2006 and even no effective proceedings are likely to take place on that day as the court has been withdrawn.