LAWS(P&H)-2006-11-91

VAISH AGGARWAL PANCHAYAT (REGD.) THANESAR Vs. YOGESH KUMAR

Decided On November 21, 2006
Vaish Aggarwal Panchayat (Regd.) Thanesar Appellant
V/S
YOGESH KUMAR Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner by way of present revision petition has challenged the orders passed by the learned Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), Kurukshetra and affirmed by the learned Additional District Judge, Kurukshetra, dismissing the application filed by the petitioner for setting aside the judgment and decree dated 19th of September, 1998.

(2.) THE land measuring 20 kanals situated within the revenue estate of village Parra-Khera, Tehsil Thanesar, District Kurukshetra was owned by Sarvshri Krishan Chand and Ved Pal. Shri Ved Pal for himself and as a General Attorney of his brother Krishan Chand, executed an agreement to sell dated 2.11.1992 and received a sum of Rs. 3 lacs in advance out of the total sale consideration of Rs. 10 lacs. The possession of the land was transferred to the prospective vendees. The suit was filed by the prospective vendees against the vendors seeking a decree for permanent injunction restraining them from dispossessing the vendee-plaintiffs as also from interference in their possession or in raising of further construction on the suit land. The suit was contested by the defendants and subsequently the suit was got amended and relief of specific performance of agreement was also sought. The suit was decreed in favour of the plaintiffs on 19th of September, 1998 and a decree for specific performance of the agreement was passed in their favour and against the defendants.

(3.) IT is not in dispute that the gift deeds in favour of the petitioner were made during the pendency of the litigation between the donors/vendors and the prospective vendees, wherein specific performance of the agreement to sell dated 2.11.1992 was involved. It has also been noticed that no permission of the Court was sought before executing the gift deeds in favour of the petitioner. The Court also took notice of the fact that the knowledge of the pendency of the litigation regarding the lis came to the notice of the petitioner in view of the objection petition filed by it.