SAWARN SINGH Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This regular second appeal has been filed by the plaintiff against concurrent findings recorded by the Courts below dismissing his suit. Plaintiff has retired from service on 7.12.1995.

(2.) Mr. W.R. Dua learned Counsel appearing before me has raised a twofold contention. He submits that the plaintiff was due to cross the efficiency bar on 4.12.1974. However, by an order dated 18.3.1975 he was withheld at the efficiency bar. He was thereafter allowed to cross the efficiency bar with effect from 1.2.1976 by the Director, Animal Husbandry, Haryana on 11.1.1985. Mr. Dua firstly contended that erroneously the Director, Animal Husbandry, Haryana allowed him to cross the efficiency bar from 1.2.1976 instead of 4.12.1974. In this regard the lower Appellate Court has found that the Director, Animal Husbandry, Haryana consciously allowed the plaintiff to cross the efficiency bar with effect from 1.2.1976 and not due to inadvertence. The relevant observations of the lower Appellate Court are as hereunder:

(3.) I however find no merit in the argument raised by learned Counsel for the plaintiff.