ANIL SANGWAN Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) (ORAL)

(2.) LEARNED counsel for the parties have agreed that petitioner No. 1 Shri Anil Sangwan son of Shri Ajit Singh have the higher qualification in the same line and as per the interim direction issued by the Division Bench, vide order dated 29.3.2000, he was interviewed and selected. He was also provisionally appointed as he had the qualification of B.P.Ed/D.P.Ed. It has also been conceded that the controversy is covered by a Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of Multan Singh v. State of Haryana, 2004 (3) RSJ 611.