SAHIB SINGH Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB

JUDGEMENT

(1.) COUNSEL for the petitioners contends that as per the allegations levelled in the FIR, petitioner no.1 has been attributed a lalkara, whereas petitioner no.2 has been attributed a dang blow, to the waist of the complainant. This injury to the waist has been declared simple. It is contended that the injury answering to the description of an offence under Section 326 of the Indian Penal Code is attributed to Jodh Singh and Sukhdev Singh, who are already behind bars.

(2.) NOTICE of motion to Advocate General, Punjab for 19.9.2006. Meanwhile, in the event of arrest of the petitioners, they shall be released on interim anticipatory bail by the Arresting Officer to his satisfaction, subject to the following conditions :-