VIRENDER SINGH Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) (Oral).

(2.) NOTICE of motion to the respondents. On the asking of Court, Shri Ashok Jindal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. The primary grievance made by the petitioner is that his claim with regard to allotment of a plot under the Oustee s quota has been rejected vide order dated May 29, 2006 (Annexure P.8). However, no reasons, whatsoever, have been given in the aforesaid order. From the perusal of the aforesaid order (Annexure P.8), we find that the grievance of the petitioner appears to be justified. In the order (Annexure P.8), whereby the claim of the petitioner has been rejected and the amount of earnest money has been refunded, no reasons, whatsoever, have been recorded.