BUDH SINGH & ORS. Vs. RANJIT SINGH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) PRESENT revision petition has been filed against the orders passed by the courts below ordering ejectment of the petitioners by holding the building to be unfit and unsafe for human habitation.

(2.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioners contends that in the absence of notice under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act no petition under Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act (for short the Act) was maintainable. This contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners is totally misconceived as there is no requirement of service of notice under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act in a case for eviction filed under Section 13 of the Act.

(3.) NO ground is made out for interference in the impugned orders passed by the courts below. Dismissed. Appeal dismissed.