RAM NIWAS Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution prays for quashing order dated 28.4.2006 (Annexure P.14) passed by the Director General of Police, Haryana. The Director General of Police has ordered reconstruction of the adverse remarks given to the petitioner for the period of 16.5.1992 to 31.3.1993 on the ground that the Inspector General of Police, Rohtak Range, Rohtak, respondent no.3 had illegally expunged those remarks vide his order dated 11.7.2000 after the rejection of earlier representation made by the petitioner by his predecessor. There is an express order passed by his predecessor on 2.2.1994 ( Annexure P.9).

(2.) Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner has been serving in the police department of the respondent-State and has earned promotion. He is posted as Assistant Sub Inspector at Police Station Madhuban (Karnal).For the period 17.7.1992 to 13.10.1992 he had earned adverse remarks 'integrity doubtful' and a show cause notice in that regard was issued to him on 18.5.1993. In the show cause notice, the following assertions were made:

(3.) The petitioner was asked to submit his explanation as to why the punishment of Censure be not imposed on him. His explanation was scrutinised but the same was found unsatisfactory. Accordingly, the explanation was rejected and punishment of Censure was imposed vide order dated 22.6.1993. The Reporting Officer for the period 16/5/1992 to 31/3/1992 recorded the following adverse remarks against the petitioner: