R.D. GOYAL Vs. HARYANA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The present writ petition has been filed to impugn the order dated 27.7.1994 vide which the petitioner was prematurely retired from service. The petitioner had joined the service of the respondent Board as a Clerk on 1.10.1955. He was due to attain the age of superannuation on 30.11.1995. However he was compulsorily retired on 27.7.1994 when he was about 57 years of age. It is this order of compulsory retirement which is under challenge in this revision petition.

(2.) At this stage it would be apposite to reproduce the order of retirement which is as hereunder :

(3.) In this situation therefore since the petitioner has more than 70% 'Good' reports he could not have been retired prematurely as per Government instructions.