BAGGA Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB

JUDGEMENT

(1.) COUNSEL for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been attributed a lalkara only. No injury, whatsoever, has been attributed to him. His co-accused Chanan Singh has already been granted interim protection in Crl.Misc.No.37413-M of 2006, vide order of this Court dated 4.7.2006. Notice of motion to Advocate General, Punjab, for 17.8.2006. Meanwhile, in the event of arrest of the petitioner, he shall bereleased on interim anticipatory bail by the Arresting Officer to his satisfaction, subject to the following conditions :-