RAJINDER Vs. NAMARTA BAHAL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioners/plaintiffs have filed the present revision petition against the order dated 6.8.1996 passed by the Additional District Judge, Sonipat, by which their application under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC was dismissed.

(2.) THE petitioners/plaintiffs filed a suit for permanent injunction wherein it was averred that as the plaintiffs and defendant No. 1 are joint owners of the suit property, therefore, the defendant be restrained from alienating the suit property in any manner till the property is duly partitioned. Before the trial Court, it was prima facie shown by the petitioners that defendant No. 1 has sold 8 kanals and 3 marlas of land comprised in killa No. 12/22 to defendant No. 2 and has also handed over possession of the land. The plaintiffs made out a prima facie case in their favour with regard to the joint ownership over the land in dispute and, therefore, the trial Court restrained the defendant from interfering in the peaceful possession of the plaintiffs over the specific killa numbers of the suit plot detailed in para 1 of the plaint. However, in revision this order has been set aside. The lower Appellate Court has held that as vacant land has been transferred as per the sale-deed, therefore, the petitioners are not entitled to any injunction.

(3.) IN view of the above, I set aside the order dated 6.8.1996 passed by the Additional District Judge, Sonipat, and direct the parties to maintain status-quo with regard to possession as well as alienation of the suit land. The trial Court shall decide the case expeditiously, if not already decided. Petition allowed.