JARNAIL SINGH Vs. FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE prayer made in the application for impleading the LRs' of respondent No. 4, Harbans Singh, is allowed subject to all just exceptions.

(2.) THE petitioner Jarnail Singh had been allotted some land treating him to be in cultivating possession thereof. The aforesaid allotment had been cancelled by the Sales Commissioner, Pathankot on 11.12.2001. It was found as a fact that the controversy with regard to the actual possession of Jarnail Singh was involved in RSA No. 2473 of 2000 before this Court. Consequently, an order was passed by the Sales Commissioner cancelling the allotment in favour of Jarnail Singh, leaving the question of re-allotment open after the decision of the High Court in the said Regular Second Appeal.

(3.) WE have heard learned counsel for the parties and have also gone through the record of the case.