AMRIK SINGH Vs. VARDHAN PROPERTIES AND INVESTMENT LTD

JUDGEMENT

(1.) BY way of present revision petition challenge is to the order dated 19.8.2005 vide which the learned Additional District Judge, Chandigarh has been pleased to adjourn the case for arguments instead of recording evidence on the issues already framed by holding that the issues as well as the evidence as already recorded stand effaced.

(2.) THE learned Additional District Judge was pleased to efface the issues and the evidence already led by placing reliance on the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in F.C.I. v. Indian Council for Arbitration, 2003(4) RCR(Civil) 411 : 2003(3) SCC 564 and the judgments of Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of Sandeep Kumar v. Ashok Hans, 2004(3) Arbitration Law Reporter 306 and Sial Brothers v. SBEC System, 2004(3) Arbitration Law Reporter 429.

(3.) THE learned counsel for the petitioners placed reliance on Rules 1 and 2 which reads as under :