SATGURU OIL MILLS Vs. SUNDER MAL HARI CHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) (ORAL)

(2.) COUNSEL for the petitioners contends that application for recalling the witness of the petitioners has been solely rejected on the ground that there is no provision for recalling the witness under Order 18 Rule 17 of C.P.C. But this observation of the learned trial Court appears to be wrong on the face of it, inasmuch as the Order 18 Rule 17 of C.P.C. categorically states that the Court may, at any stage of a suit, recall any witness, who has been examined and may put such question to him as the Court thinks fit.