LAWS(P&H)-2006-10-52

MUKESH BHARTI Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

Decided On October 12, 2006
MUKESH BHARTI Appellant
V/S
STATE OF HARYANA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) (ORAL)

(2.) THE instant petition is directed against the cancellation of transfer order by passing order dated 9.10.2006 (P-3). Before approaching this Court the petitioner has not made any representation to respondent Nos. 2 and 3 by bringing to their notice that the policy instructions providing guidelines for transfer have been violated by the impugned order. THErefore, we deem it just and appropriate to relegate the petitioner to the remedy of filing representation before respondent No. 2 by brining to his notice all the grounds taken in this petition showing that the policy instructions providing guidelines for transfer have been violated. Let a representation be made under a Registered A.D. cover within a period of two weeks and if that be done then respondent No. 2 shall pass a speaking order on the representation made by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. THE writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms.