DHARAM PAL TAYAL Vs. BALBIR SINGH AND OTHERS

JUDGEMENT

(1.) A perusal of the orders of the Courts below would show that it was established that the possession had been taken by the respondent-decree holder of the property on the basis of the execution of the decree. The possession was not taken forcibly or illegally by the respondent. The warrants of possession was issued in execution of decree and pursuant thereto possession was delivered to the decree holder. The objection petition filed against delivery of possession was dismissed. Thereafter, the appeals filed against the said order, were also dismissed. The petitioner did not even produce any of orders passed by the appellate Court and his General Power if Attorney stated that he was not aware of the facts of the case. In this situation following finding was recorded by the learned Additional District Judge, Muktsar:-