RAJ SINGH Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) LEARNED AAG contends that in pursuance of order dated 13.9.1995 passed by this Court, the petitioners have joined the investigations. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned AAG on the main petition for anticipatory bail. A case F.I.R. No. 8 dated 11.3.1994 under Sections 409/467/468/471/201/120-B IPC, Police Station Intelligence Bureau, Karnal has been registered against the petitioners. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that in the F.I.R. it has been mentioned that the participation of Raj Singh and Rishipal (both petitioners) has been found in this action. It has further been contended that there are no allegations of embezzlement against the petitioners as they have not been entrusted with the cash in the Co-operative Society. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the petition is allowed subject to the following conditions;