LAWS(P&H)-1995-10-7

BHUPINDER KUMAR Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

Decided On October 31, 1995
BHUPINDER KUMAR Appellant
V/S
STATE OF HARYANA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) ORDER :- Petitioner accused has prayed for quashment of FIR No. 329 dated August 14, 1995 registered under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act by Police Station City Sirsa.

(2.) Uncontrovertedly the petitioner is a registered public distributor under the agreement of distribution given to him by Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited. He is running the business of supplying liquified petroleum gas to consumers under the terms and conditions of the said agreement, to be regulated by the Liquified Petroleum Gas (Regulation of Supply and Distribution) Order, 1993 (in short, the Order). On August 5, 1995, Additional Deputy Commissioner, Sirsa, along with Assistant Food and Supplies Officer and his staff conducted surprise checking at the show room and godown of M/s Bhupindra Gas Agency. Sirsa, of which the petitioner is the proprietor. Various irregularities were found during the checking. The stock register had entries only upto July 31, 1995, and not upto August 5, 1995, the date of checking. After accounting for the subsequent receipt and sales, a shortage of 22 filled cylinders and 22 empty cylinders of LPG was detected. It was also found from the checking of the various registers maintained at the petitioner's shop that he was charging more price for home delivery as well as go down delivery of gas Cylinders from the customers. Gas cylinders were sold in black-marketing also. The addresses of the consumers to whom cylinders were supplied on priority basis were not found to be genuine. Hence after conducting the search, the registers, books of accounts etc., empty and filled gas cylinders were seized. The matter was reported to the police and investigation is yet not completed.

(3.) Petitioners learned counsel, relying on Kala Devi alias Kala v. State of Haryana 1995(2) Recent CR 427 contended that the entire proceedings are illegal as the same were conducted in violation of Clause 11 of the Order. He pointed out that as per Clause 11 of the order only duly authorised and notified officers of the department of food and civil supplies can enter the petitioner's premises for making search or for effecting seizure. He further pointed out that from a plain perusal of Clause 11(a) (iii) of the Order it is evident that if at all any empty or filled cylinders, cylinder valves, pressure regulators etc., books, registers and other records pertaining to liquified petroleum gas business are seized, they are required to be taken to the Office of the Government Oil Company and if any vehicle, vessel or other conveyance is so seized, it should be taken to the Collector having jurisdiction under the Essential Commodities Act to take action. Thus, according to him, the Officer who conducted the search had no power or authority to make such a search or seize the books of accounts etc. or cylinders etc., from the petitioner's shop. They could have only taken these things to the office of the Government Oil Company which has given the contract of distribution to the petitioner. These Officers themselves had no authority to conduct any investigation in such a case.