BANARSI DAS Vs. PADMA WATI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The only point raised in this petition is that the respondent could not claim ejectment of the petitioner on grounds of personal necessity because a husband is not a member of the family of the wife in the eyes of law. In support of this proposition, the learned counsel for the petitioner cites Re-Mc-Keown, 1962 (Vol. 3) Dominion Law Reports 796. This case is, however, distinguishable on facts.