HARI NIRANJAN AND ANR Vs. RAM RATTAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Petitioners before me are the legal representatives of Smt. Chandania, Landlord of the shop in dispute. Smt. Chandania had filed ejectment petition against the respondent on three grounds. She claimed that the respondent-tenant is guilty of non-payment of rent and house tax from June 1, 1963 and that he had removed the middle wall of the shop and had damaged its roof, thus materially affecting its value and utility adversely and had also kept it closed for the last two years prior to the filing of the petition. These allegations were denied by the respondent-tenant on the pleadings of the parties, following issues were framed :

(2.) For the reasons recorded above, this petition is accepted, the judgment of the First Appellate Court is set aside and the petition for ejectment filed by the landlord is allowed. However, there will be no order as to costs.