LAWS(P&H)-2025-8-13

MOHD. IQBAL Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

Decided On August 12, 2025
MOHD. IQBAL Appellant
V/S
STATE OF HARYANA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The petition in hand has been filed under Sec. 482 of Cr.P.C. praying for transfer of investigation of the FIR No.239 dtd. 5/9/2022, registered under Sec. 302 of IPC at Police Station Pinangwa, District Nuh to respondent No.2 i.e. CBI from the local police.

(2.) The gravamen of the FIR in question is that the complainant has averred that his nephew namely Munir Khan @ Sameer, aged about 10/11 years was pursing studies in Arabic and Urdu at Madrasa Dargahwala, village Shah Chokha. On 3/9/2022, Mr. Hazi Akhtar, brother of Mr. Kallu, Sarpanch of village Ter, informed the complainant that his nephew was missing from the madrasa. Thereafter, every possible effort was made by the complainant to trace his nephew but to no avail. On 5/9/2022, at around 01:00 PM, Akhtar informed the complainant that the dead body of his nephew was found inside a small room at Madrasa Dargahwala in Jama Masjid and a foul smell is coming. It was further alleged by the complainant that he has a strong reason to believe that his nephew had been murdered. In view of the facts narrated hereinabove, the petitioner had requested for strict action against the accused.

(3.) Learned counsel for the petitioner has iterated that the local police has failed to investigate the material facts of the present case. It has been further iterated that the local police has neither conducted a fair inquiry nor made earnest efforts to ascertain the true facts and circumstances leading to the brutal murder of the nephew of the petitioner. Learned counsel has asserted that the petitioner has completely lost faith in the local police who has not conducted free and fair investigation into the FIR in question on account of influence exerted by the private respondents. It has been urged, on behalf of the petitioner, that the incident in question is a blind murder which solely rests upon the circumstantial evidence and hence a thorough and impartial investigation needs to be conducted by a specialized/independent agency i.e. respondent No.2-CBI. On the basis of aforesaid submission, the petitioner has sought for grant of prayer as made in the petition.