MARUTI UDYOG LIMITED Vs. MEMBER SALES TAX TRIBUNAL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) WRITTEN statement filed on behalf of respondents is taken on record.

(2.) ADMITTED . Pleadings of the parties are complete. By consent, writ petition placed on board and called out for hearing.

(3.) MR . Sarin, learned counsel appearing in support of this petition, urged that the impugned order suffers from non-application of mind to the various contentions which were raised in appeal memo and stay application. He urged that the impugned order does not indicate any reasons while rejecting stay application. He further urged that the Tribunal has failed to exercise its jurisdiction in accordance with law while disposing of the stay application.