SHATIN KUMAR GOYAL Vs. PUNJAB UNIVERSITY

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner by way of this writ petition has sought the indulgence of this Court for the issuance of writ of mandamus directing the respondents to grant admission to him to 3rd Semester of LL. B. for the year 1994 by way of migration from Punjabi University, Patiala, to Punjab University, Chandigarh.

(2.) SOME of the facts which have not been disputed before this Court may be taken note of before determining the real question of controversy.

(3.) DURING the course of arguments, Mr. Anupam Gupta, learned counsel for the respondents has admitted that the petitioner was falling short of 0. 28 per cent of marks as compared with the last candidate admitted in the year 1993-94 and that the petitioner would have been entitled to seek from migration to the Panjab University if he had secured same or higher marks than the last candidate who was admitted in the year 1993. In view of this position, the controversy, in my considered opinion, stands narrowed down to this extent that if this court condones 0. 28 per cent marks then the petitioner would be entitled to migration and in case this Court does not condone the deficiency, the petitioner would not be entitled to seek migration Punjabi University to Panjab University. If the later course is adopted, the petitioner would, inevitably, waste his one year.