MOOL CHAND CHHABRA Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) BY this order two writ petition Nos. 11103 and 11722 of 1993 are being disposed of as common question of law has been raised. The judgment is prepared in Civil Writ Petition No. 11103 of 1993.

(2.) MOOL Chand Chhabra-petitioner was working as Sanitary Inspector in the Municipal Committee, Karnal. Vide order dated August 30, 1993, Annexure P-1, he stood transferred as such to Panipat Municipal Committee. This order is challenged in this writ petition on the ground that the transfer order has not been passed by the competent authority. The Haryana Municipal Services Integration Recruitments and Conditions of Services Rules, 1932, deal with the subject. Rule 2 (3), defines the appointing authority of different employees as per appendix 'c attached thereto. An item No. 44 of that appendix provides that for Sanitary Inspector, the appointing Authority would be Deputy Commissioner. Thus, the case of the petitioner is that the transfer, if any, could be effected by the Deputy Commissioner and that too within the District.

(3.) ON notice of motion having been issued, in the written statement filed by the respondents, it is asserted that in fact under Rule 13 employees of one Municipal Committee could be transferred to other Municipal Committee outside the district. Rule-33 on which reliance has been placed, provides as under: