KISHAN LAL Vs. PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The petitioners have challenged the orders of the prescribed Authority dated July 1, 1993 (Annexure. P -5 and P -6 to this writ petition) in this petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India.

(2.) The fact: -

(3.) When the writ petition came up for hearing, we thought it proper to dispose of the objections. We asked the learned counsel for the petitioner to substantiate the objections which they had taken to the execution of the decree. He submitted that the petitioners be allowed to lead evidence. To avoid delay, we permitted the parties to lead evidence. The petitioners did not lead any evidence except that their counsel tendered a photostat copies of the notice and statements of accounts, Ex. C.1 and C.2. The respondent -Bank examined Sh. Uma Kant Ghai, Senior Manager, Punjab National Bank, Tohana, on January 10, 1994. His statement reads thus : -