TANNU GALHOTRA ALIAS NEERAJ Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB

JUDGEMENT

(1.) It has been contended by the counsel for the petitioner that according to the allegations in the FIR, the petitioner was alleged to be armed with a hockey and he is alleged to have given a hockey blow on the left arm of Paramjit Singh injured. He has further contended that the injury suffered by Paramjit Singh is not a grievous one.

(2.) Mr. I. P. S. Sidhu, Asstt. Advocate General, Punjab, has fairly conceded that the injury caused by the petitioner to Paramjit Singh injured is not a grievous one.

(3.) Accordingly the application for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail by the arresting officer.