GHAN SHYAM Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) ALL the Criminal Misc. Applications are allowed.

(2.) PETITIONER 's counsel submits that petitioner's father expired on 12.9.1994. He is undergoing imprisonment under Section 302 I.P.C. vide order dated 18.5.1994. He was arrested on 10.9.1991, thus he has undergone imprisonment for more than 3 years. His conduct remained good and satisfactory inside the Jail. He has not committed any jail offence. He applied for grant of emergency parole on 13.9.1994. His petition was recommended by Superintendent of Jail on 20.9.1994. Despite instructions of the Haryana Government (Letter No. 4646-5--JJ-77/22774 dated 15.8.1977), his petition was not decided expeditiously. Hence it is prayed that three weeks emergency parole be granted to him to perform last ceremonies on the death of his father. Respondents counsel submits that the Superintendent of Police, Faridabad by his report dated 8.10.1994 and District Magistrate, Faridabad by his report dated 20.10.1994 have expressed that petitioner's parole can endanger the life of the eye witnesses of that case. Hence his release was not recommended and prayer was not granted.