RAVINDER KUMAR Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HAVING heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, having gone through the record with his valuable help and after bestowal of thoughts over the entire matter, to my mind, there is no merit and the instant revision petition deserves to be dismissed for the reasons mentioned herein -below.

(2.) AS is evident from the record that, initially, in the wake of complaint of petitioner -complainant Ravinder Kumar son of Mahender Singh (for brevity "the complainant"), a criminal case was registered against the accused, vide FIR No.101 dated 28.2.2013, on accusation of having committed the offences punishable under sections 323, 364, 368, 506 and 120 -B IPC by the police of Police Station City Narnaul.

(3.) DURING the course of investigation of the criminal case, accused Deepak s/o Dolat Ram, Banti alias Rajesh s/o Dharam Pal, Guddu @ Karan s/o Shakti Singh, Anil s/o Raghuvir, Jagmal HC, Dashrat Singh Constable and Kanjod Singh ASI (respondents Nos.2 to 8) respectively, were found innocent and exonerated by the investigating agency. At the same time, after completion of the investigation, the police submitted the final police report (challan) (Annexure P1) against main accused Dinesh s/o Nityanand, Narender Yadav @ Nirenjan, Rakesh @ Rakka s/o Jagmal and Dinesh s/o Dolat Ram. They were accordingly charge sheeted for the commission of pointed offences and the case was slated for evidence of the prosecution.