OPENDER PAL Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE matrix of the facts and material, culminating in the commencement, relevant for disposal of the instant petition and emanating from the record, is that, initially in the wake of complaint of complainant Santosh wife of Birender Singh -respondent No. 2 (for brevity "the complainant"), a criminal case was registered against the petitioners -accused Opender Pal son of Subhash and others, for having caused the injuries to complainant, Naveen Kumar and Ashwani Kumar sons of Birender Kumar (respondent Nos. 2 to 4), vide FIR No. 243 dated 11.05.2014 (Annexure P -1), on accusation of having committed the offences punishable under Sections 148, 149, 323, 452, 506 and 354 -B IPC, by the police of Police Station Mohindergarh.

(2.) DURING the course of investigation, good sense prevailed and the parties have amicably settled their disputes, by means of compromise dated 24.05.2014 (Annexure P -2) and affidavits of complainant and injured PWs dated 23.05.2014 (Annexures P -3 to P -5).

(3.) DURING the course of preliminary hearing, the Magistrate, having the jurisdiction, was directed to record the statements of all the concerned parties, with regard to the genuineness and validity or otherwise of the compromise (Annexure P -2), by means of order dated 29.05.2014, by this Court.