RITHIK GANDHI Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE instant petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of F.I.R. No. 4 dated 14.1.2014 under sections 406, 498A I.P.C. registered at Police Station Women Cell, District Jalandhar City. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would contend that the dispute between the parties which was essentially matrimonial in nature, has been amicably settled and towards such assertion would advert to a compromise deed dated 3.2.2014 placed on record at Annexure P -2.

(2.) UPON notice of motion having been issued, Mr. Anterpreet Singh, Advocate had put in appearance on behalf of complainant/respondent no. 2 namely Manisha Gandhi wife of petitioner no. 1. Counsel also states that the matter has been compromised. Even a reply by way of affidavit dated 7.3.2014 of the complainant has been filed in Court today and the same is taken on record. Perusal of the reply would reveal that the deponent i.e. Complainant in the present case has no objection to the F.I.R. being quashed in the light of compromise dated 3.2.2014. That apart, complainant Manisha Gandhi is present in Court and is identified through counsel. She even suffers a statement as per affidavit submitted today in Court.

(3.) PETITIONER no. 1, who is present in Court makes a statement and undertakes to make the balance payment of Rs. 7 lacs upon the petition preferred under section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act being accepted.