VIKRAM Vs. RAJESH AND ORS.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) IN a suit filed by petitioner -plaintiff Vikram seeking a decree of declaration and possession, an application for impleading legal representatives of Om Parkash son of Bharat Ram, defendant No. 4 therein, was dismissed on 4.10.2013. Impugning this order, in this revision petition, it is claimed by the petitioner -plaintiff that he had come to know of death of defendant No. 4 Om Parkash subsequent to filing of the suit and hence cognizance of death of defendant No. 4 on 27.7.2007 could not be taken in the plaint at the time of institution of the suit. It is urged that moving of application by the plaintiff for bringing LRs of deceased -defendant No. 4 on record was delayed because it was beyond the control of the petitioner -plaintiff. Per contra, stand of the contesting respondents is that the suit against a dead person is not maintainable and is to be dismissed.

(2.) HEARING has been provided to the counsel for the parties while going through the paper book.

(3.) NO doubt, the application for impleadment of LRs of defendant No. 4 was not filed with expeditious despatch after information of death report of defendant No. 4 was available on record on 10.3.2009 but the fact remains that defendant No. 4 is no more. It is alleged that this fact somehow escaped from the notice of the petitioner -plaintiff at the time of filing of the suit and when it became known, the application for impleadment of LRs was filed.