KULTAR SINGH JOGI Vs. RANJIT SINGH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Petitioner has filed this petition challenging the order dated 23.11.2012, whereby leave to contest the ejectment petition was granted to respondent No. 1. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the record available on the file carefully.

(2.) Petitioner has sought ejectment of respondent No. 1 by moving a petition under Section 13-B of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949. Rent Controller while granting the leave to contest the ejectment petition to respondent No. 1 has observed as under:-

(3.) Thus, in the present case, the tenant-respondent No. 1 had disputed the relationship of landlord and tenant between the parties. Case of the tenant is that Kuldip Kaur and her son were the owners of the premises in question on the basis of Will dated 18.07.1979. No rent note had been executed between the petitioner and respondent No. 1.