PROMILA Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) IT is the contention of the counsel for the petitioner that advertisement dated 08.11.2012 (Annexure P -5) and the notice dated 15.11.2013 (Annexure P -6), which grants relaxation in the last date of submission of the applications as also to the limited extension to the persons, who had completed four years experience but were not in service on 11.04.2012 and qua the candidates who had passed their HTET in the year 2013, entitles the petitioner also to the extension of the last date of submission of the applications, which would mean the qualifications also.

(2.) ALTHOUGH the petitioner has passed the Elementary Teacher Training Course in the year 2013, which is prior to the now extended date of submission of the applications, i.e., 29.11.2013, but the counsel contends that the action of the respondents in not accepting the candidature of the petitioner is unsustainable. This contention of the counsel for the petitioner cannot be accepted in the light of the order passed in Civil Writ Petition No.1696 of 2014 (Rekha Rani & others Versus State of Haryana & others), decided on 30.01.2014, wherein it has been held as follows: -

(3.) A perusal of the notice dated 08.03.2013 (Annexure P -4), which primarily is the document on which petitioners rely on, itself speaks about the eligibility condition. The heading of the same reads as under: -