HARBHAJAN SINGH Vs. PAL SINGH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS batch of six regular second appeals is proposed to be decided together as all these appeals are directed against the same judgments and decrees passed by the learned courts below qua the same property. Particulars of these appeals are RSA No. 491 of 2007 (Harbhajan Singh and another Vs. Pal Singh and others), RSA No. 492 of 2007 (Harbhajan Sngh and others Vs. Pal Singh and others), RSA No. 1721 of 2007 (Vishav Gurmut Roohani Mission Trust Vs. Pal Singh and others), RSA No. 1722 of 2007 (Vishav Gurmut Roohani Mission Trust Vs. Pal Singh and others), RSA No. 1723 of 2007 ( Prem Singh Vs. Pal Singh and others) and RSA No. 1724 of 2007 ( Prem Singh Vs. Pal Singh and others). However, for the facility of reference, facts are being culled out from RSA No. 491 of 2007.

(2.) APPELLANTS -defendants have instituted all these six appeals against the concurrent judgments and decrees passed by the learned courts below in different suits for declaration, decreed by the learned trial court by common judgment and decree dated 31.3.2005, which were upheld by the learned lower appellate court again vide common judgment and decree dated 21.12.2006.

(3.) EARLIER , Madho Singh himself sold one piece of land vide sale deed dated 25.8.1994 to Prem Singh. The abovesaid different sale deeds executed by Mehma Singh -attorney of Madho Singh, came to be challenged by brothers and sisters of Madho Singh by different suits for declaration. On the statement made by learned counsel for the parties, all the suits were consolidated for the purpose of recording evidence and decision thereof. All the civil suits were consolidated with civil suit No. 560 of 18.11.1996 titled as Babu Singh Vs. Prem Singh.