GURMUKH SINGH Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB

JUDGEMENT

(1.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of the petition qua petitioner No.3.

(2.) DISMISSED as withdrawn qua petitioner No.3. By way of this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for brevity, 'the Code'), petitioners, who are accused in First Information Report (for short, 'FIR') No.413 dated 05.09.2007 (Annexure P -1) recorded under Sections 454, 201, 448, 341, 506, 511, 148, 149, 120 -B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, 'IPC'), and 25 of the Arms Act, at Police Station, Sadar, Patiala, District Patiala, seek quashing of the aforesaid FIR by stating that the matter has been amicably settled between them and respondent No.2 as evidenced by the compromise deed dated 28.11.2013 (Annexure P -2).

(3.) IN the FIR, Annexure P -1, it was alleged by complainant/ respondent No.2 that on 4.9.2004, when she was in Bathinda at her younger son Joginder Singh's house, she was informed that 2/3 cars were parked in front of her Kothi at village Sullar near Dera Mahanta and after getting this information when she returned back, she found that the petitioners had already taken forcible possession of her Kothi. Now, with the intervention of respectables, respondent No.2 has compromised the matter with the petitioners and has no grudge against them.