DHANNU @ SHIV SINGH Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) AS the identical points for consideration to grant anticipatory bail or otherwise to the petitioners are involved, therefore, I propose to decide the petitions i.e. CRM No. M -40740 of 2013 filed by petitioner Dhannu alias Shiv Singh s/o Kharak Singh (for brevity "1st case") and CRM No. M -6023 of 2014 filed by petitioner Babu Lal son of Rajbir (for short "2nd case"), arising out of the same case/FIR, vide this common decision in order to avoid the repetition of facts.

(2.) THE petitioners have directed the instant separate petitions for the grant of pre -arrest bail, invoking the provisions of section 438 Cr.PC., in a case registered against them, by means of FIR No.569 dated 7.11.2013, on accusation of having committed the offences punishable under Sections 420, 120 -B IPC and section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 by the police of Police Station Sadar Palwal.

(3.) NOTICES of the petitions were issued to the State.