SURJIT KAUR Vs. BIKKAR SINGH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) CM No. 4605 -C of 2013.

(2.) FOR the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. The delay of 166 days in refiling the appeal is condoned.

(3.) IN a suit filed by plaintiffs, they prayed for a declaration that the judgment and decree, passed by the then learned Sub Judge 1st Class, Gidderbaha, in Civil Suit No. 306 dated 19.10.1972 decided on 23.10.1972, regarding land measuring 126 kanal 18 marlas was illegal, null and void. Consequently, even the mutation No. 8618, which was sanctioned pursuant to the said decree, was also liable to be set aside. Thus, plaintiffs prayed for a decree for joint possession of the suit property and by a consequential relief prayed for injunction restraining defendants No. 1 to 4 from alienating the suit land.