PULKIT CHAUDHARY Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This order shall dispose of the present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C praying for the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case F.I.R. No.139 dated 3.3.2014 under sections 498 -A, 406, 506 I.P.C, registered at Police Station, City Yamunanagar. On 2.5.2014, while issuing notice of motion, the following order was passed by this Court: -

(2.) LEARNED State counsel upon instructions from ASI Subhash Chand would apprise the Court that the petitioner has otherwise joined investigation.

(3.) BE that as it may, it would be apposite to notice that as per allegations contained in the F.I.R the complainant had been given beatings by the husband as also other members of the family on 16.12.2013. On the other hand, a perusal of the D.D.R dated 20.12.2013 at Annexure P -2 which is not disputed by learned counsel for the complainant would reveal that there are allegations against the present petitioner i.e. husband as also the mother -in -law as regards torture for bringing insufficient dowry after marriage but such D.D.R which was recorded on the statement of the complainant on 20.12.2013 does not make any reference whatsoever to an incident which had allegedly taken place four days prior thereto i.e. on 16.12.2013 with regard to the beatings that she had suffered.