AVTAR SINGH Vs. SEETA DEVI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE compendium of the facts and material, culminating in the commencement, relevant for deciding the instant revision petition and emanating from the record, is that, initially, respondent -plaintiff Seeta Devi w/o Ram Dass (for brevity ''the plaintiff '') has instituted the civil suit (Annexure P1) for a decree of permanent injunction, restraining petitioner -defendant Avtar Singh alias Tari s/o Pritam Dass (for short ''the defendant ''), from changing the nature of the property in dispute, in any  manner. The plaintiff has also filed an application for ad interim injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC.

(2.) SEQUELLY , the petitioner -defendant contested the claim of plaintiff & stay application, filed the written statement (Annexure P2), stoutly denied all the allegations contained in the plaint and prayed for dismissal of the suit.

(3.) AGGRIEVED thereby, the appeal filed by the petitioner -defendant was dismissed as well, by the appellate Court, by virtue of impugned order dated 22.11.2011.