DARSHANA Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB

JUDGEMENT

(1.) AS identical points to grant the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioners are involved, therefore, I propose to dispose of indicated criminal petitions bearing CRM No. M -39324 of 2013 titled Darshana Vs. State of Punjab (for brevity "the 1st case") and CRM No. M -33717 of 2013 titled Rajinder Gaba Vs. State of Punjab (in short "2nd case), arising out of the same case/FIR, by means of this common order, to avoid the repetition of facts.

(2.) PETITIONERS , have preferred the instant separate petitions for the grant of anticipatory bail, in a case registered against them along with other co -accused Deepak Dhingra and Rajni Gaba (already on bail), vide FIR No.264 dated 31.08.2013, on accusation of having committed the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 498 -A IPC (the offence punishable under Section 494 IPC was added later on), by the police of Police Station Sadar Jalandhar.

(3.) NOTICES of the petitions were issued to the State.