TOSHIBA INDUSTRIES (INDIA) FARIDABAD Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS appeal has been preferred by the Revenue under section 36 of the Haryana Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (in short, "the Act") against the orders dated August 31, 1994, June 30, 2003 and July 8, 2013, annexures A4, A5 and A10, respectively in STR No. 41 of 2007 -08 for the assessment year 1988 -89, claiming following substantial questions of law:

(2.) THE learned counsel for the appellant -dealer submitted that the Tribunal had erroneously come to the conclusion that no reply was filed and books of account were not produced. It was urged that the findings of fact recorded by the Tribunal were vitiated being based on wrong premises.