SIMALJIT KAUR Vs. SUKHWINDER SINGH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The present appeal has been filed by the claimants-appellants, seeking enhancement of the compensation awarded by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ludhiana (for short 'the Tribunal'), vide award dated 13.2.2004, on account of death of Ramjeet Singh, in a motor vehicular accident on 31.1.2001. The learned counsel for the appellants submits that the Ld. Tribunal erred in assessing the salary of deceased at Rs. 3000/- per month. He further submits that deceased was a Sepoy in the Indian Army and as per salary certificate Ex. P4, he was earning salary of Rs. 5173/- per month but the Ld. Tribunal wrongly assessed the dependency as Rs. 2173/- per month and assessed the income of the deceased at Rs. 3000/- per month. He further stated that the amount awarded for consortium and funeral expenses is inadequate. The deceased was 30 years old and the multiplier applied by the Ld. Tribunal is on the lower side. Nothing has been awarded for loss of future income, loss of love, care and guidance to the children. He prays that the amounts under various heads may be enhanced.

(2.) I have heard the counsel for the parties.

(3.) A perusal of the file shows that PW 3, Havildar Clerk Kailash Singh of Sikh Light Infantry has produced the service record of deceased and as per the salary certificate Ex. P4, deceased was earning gross salary of Rs. 5173/- per month. The learned Tribunal applied a cut of 1/3rd towards maintenance of the deceased and assessed Rs. 3000/- per month for the maintenance of the claimants. The deceased left behind a widow and two minor children. The Ld. Tribunal wrongly deducted Rs. 2173/- as cut of 1/3rd towards personal expenses of the deceased.