SUKHWINDER SINGH Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS order shall dispose of Criminal Appeal No. D -91 -DB of Crl. A. No. D -91 -DB of 2014 & 2014 filed by complainant Sukhwinder Singh, and Criminal Appeal No. S - 2670 -SB of 2013 filed by accused Dharminder Singh alias Kala.

(2.) IN this case, FIR No. 77 dated 28.6.2000 under Sections 307/326/324/452/34 IPC was registered at Police Station Mukerian, against four accused, namely Malkiat Singh alias Beera; Jaswinder Singh alias Sodhi; Munsha Singh; and Dharminder Singh alias Kala. The said FIR was registered on the basis of the statement of Sukhwinder Singh, in which he alleged that his cousin sister Mohni had come to their village in the holidays from Nagpur. She was teased by accused Jaswinder Singh alias Sodhi. On that, hot words were exchanged between complainant Sukhwinder Singh and accused Jaswinder Singh alias Sodhi. The matter was reported to Sarpanch of the village, who got the matter settled between the parties. It was further alleged that on 27.6.2000, at about 9 PM, when the complainant was present in his house and door of his house was knocked, upon which he opened the door and found that accused Malkiat Singh alias Beera armed with kirpan, Munsha Singh armed with gandasi, Dharminder Singh alias Kala armed with datar and Jaswinder Singh alias Sodhi armed with kirpan were standing in the street. They pushed the door and entered the house of the complainant. Accused Malkiat Singh gave two kirpan blows on the head of the complainant, who fell down and thereafter, accused Munsha Singh gave two gandasi blows on the head of the complainant. Then the complainant was dragged into the street and accused Dharminder Singh gave a datar blow on his head and accused Jaswinder Singh alias Sodhi gave two kirpan blows on the head of the complainant. Accused also inflicted hidden injuries on the person of the complainant. When the complainant raised alarm, his father Gian Singh, PWs Gulshan Singh and Smt. Jaswinder Kaur came at the spot, who rescued him. Thereafter, the accused ran away from the spot with their respective weapons.

(3.) FEELING aggrieved against their conviction and sentence vide the aforesaid judgment and order, the above named three accused filed Crl. A. No. 1628 -SB of 2002. The complainant filed Criminal Revision No. 2476 of 2002 against acquittal of all the three accused for the offence under Section 307 IPC vide the aforesaid judgment dated 10.10.2002. The aforesaid appeal (Crl. A. No. 1628 -SB of 2002) and the revision (Crl. Revn. No. 2476 of 2002) were heard together. Vide judgment dated August 18, 2010, passed by this Court, the revision filed by the complainant was dismissed, whereas the appeal filed by accused Malkiat Singh alias Beera; Jaswinder Singh alias Sodhi; and Munsha Singh was disposed of with modification in the order of sentence to the extent that the sentence of rigorous imprisonment imposed upon them by the trial court was reduced to the period already undergone by them. However, the sentence of fine was enhanced to ' one lac, besides the fine already imposed by the trial court. Out of this enhanced amount of fine of 'one lac, an amount of Rs. 90,000/ - was ordered to be paid to the complainant as compensation and the remaining amount of Rs.10,000/ - was to go to the State as litigation expenses.